This has been my stance for years.
WADA boss calls for ban on tainted coaches
BY KAYON RAYNOR Senior staff reporter
[email protected]
Friday, May 14, 2010
COACHES OF athletes who are found guilty of anti-doping offences should
also be banned, says director general of the World Anti-doping Agency
(WADA) David Howman.
"Yes! And that's a subject that we feel has to be accentuated to by
government," Howman told the Observer in an exclusive interview
yesterday.
"You can deal with lawyers who misbehave; you can deal
with journalists who misbehave; you can deal with doctors who misbehave
(but), how can we deal with coaches?
"You can strip them from representing the country; you can stop them
from going to (an) event, but you can't stop them from coaching unless
there is a law, so we're looking at ways and means of where that can be
encountered," the WADA boss declared.
"The reason for it is that very often the athlete is, I can't say
innocent, but is the receptacle of information given of persuasion by
people who should know better; older people who they take guidance from
who tell them to go and do something which is wrong," Howman added.
"There should be a degree of responsibility... laid at the feet of those
people (including) coaches... trainers, agents, doctors, pharmacists,
and we think very strongly they've got to be dealt with."
According to the current WADA rules as shown on its web site,
www.wada-ama.org, the principle of strict liability only applies to
athletes.
"The principle of strict liability is applied in situations where
urine/blood samples collected from an athlete have produced adverse
analytical results.
"It means that each athlete is strictly liable for the substances found
in his or her bodily specimen, and that an anti-doping rule violation
occurs whenever a prohibited substance (or its metabolites or markers)
is found in bodily specimen, whether or not the athlete intentionally or
unintentionally used a prohibited substance or was negligent or
otherwise at fault."
Conversely, there are few documented cases where coaches of sanction
athletes have been handed coaching bans.
In July 2008, the United States Anti-doping Agency (USADA) slapped
Trevor Graham with a lifetime coaching ban for reportedly helping his
athletes, which included Marion Jones, Justin Gatlin and Tim Montgomery,
to obtain performance-enhancing drugs. Graham has always denied
providing performance-enhancers to his athletes.
Athletics Canada also handed Ben Johnson's former coach, the late
Charlie Francis, a life-time ban after he told a 1989 inquiry that he
had introduced Johnson to steroids.
Johnson tested positive for the steroid stanozolol after winning the 100
metres at the 1988 Seoul Olympics and was stripped of his gold medal.
The WADA boss hinted that until countries put legislation in place to
sanction coaches and other athlete representatives, the anti-doping
fight will not end.
"They should be subject to at least the same sort of sanctions as the
athletes. They should be out of sport for two years or out of sport for
four years. There's no reason why not, so I look at it from the angle of
being fair to all that might be part of something," he said.
"If you look in society and you say they are five people are involved in
a crime, you don't just prosecute one, you get the whole five who are
involved in the conspiracy. We should be doing the same in sport," added
Howman, who is a lawyer by profession.
WADA, which is headquartered in Montreal, Canada, was established in
1999 to act as an independent international agency to co-ordinate
efforts to rid sports of doping. The agency involves government
representatives, certain inter-governmental organisations, alongside
sporting bodies.